OOXML seems to be through… [updated]

March 30, 2008 – 22:30

ISO Meeting

(Source)

“Counting the countries, it is pretty certain that the votes are enough to get OOXML through this vote.” said Pieter Hintjens on the Noooxml-mailing list. A press release for tomorrow has been prepared:

Geneva, 1 April 2008. The International Organization for Standardization announced at a press conference that its processes are “broken” and “need radical reform”. ISO president Håkan Murby told journalists that “the Microsoft OOXML process was a near-disaster and we want to make sure such a thing never happens again.”

(Source)

[Update: On the OpenDoc mailing list Michiel Leenaars posted the official results which should probably be published by ISO on April, 2nd:

P-Members voting: 24 in favour out of 32 = 75 % (requirement >= 66.66%)
(P-Members having abstained are not counted in this vote.)

Member bodies voting: 10 negative votes out of 71 = 14 % (requirement <= 25%)

Approved

(Source)

In the meantime, Steve Pepper, the chairman of the Norwegian NB, formally protested against the "Yes"-vote of his country:

You will have been notified that Norway voted to approve OOXML in this ballot. This decision does not reflect the view of the vast majority of the Norwegian committee, 80% of which was against changing Norway’s vote from No with comments to Yes.

Because of this irregularity, a call has been made for an investigation by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry with a view to changing the vote.

(Source)

While a possible turn of this vote into "No" may have helped yesterday (while the Yes-votes where only 22/32, or 68,75%), it may not be enough after all today, since at least two more countries would have to protest to make a change. Not that there would not have been reported enough irregularities in other NBs, like for example in Germany, Romania, Poland and the list goes on.]

  1. 2 Responses to “OOXML seems to be through… [updated]”

  2. It’s funny but change your byline to April 1, 2008

    By Dennis Byron on Mar 30, 2008

  3. Actually, this happens if you just copy’n'paste text from another ressource without really proof-reading it… thanks!

    By tommyd on Mar 31, 2008

Post a Comment