Comments for dead fish http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog only dead fish swim with the stream Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:47:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 Comment on Qt Framework introduction by Plasma http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/08/14/qt-framework-introduction/#comment-455 Plasma Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:17:07 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=163#comment-455 <p>Wie gesagt, das kommt mir sehr gelegen. Ich suche gerade die Möglichkeit eine plattformunabhängige Grafikanwendung zu schreiben, und Java kackt bezüglich OpenGL ziemlich ab, wenn ich das mal so sagen darf. Sämtliche Libraries die ich bisher ausprobiert habe, bringen mich alle an einem sehr frühen Punkt zum Verzweifeln. Vielleicht komme ich doch irgendwann auf eine Kombination aus Qt und Nebula Device zurück...</p> Wie gesagt, das kommt mir sehr gelegen. Ich suche gerade die Möglichkeit eine plattformunabhängige Grafikanwendung zu schreiben, und Java kackt bezüglich OpenGL ziemlich ab, wenn ich das mal so sagen darf. Sämtliche Libraries die ich bisher ausprobiert habe, bringen mich alle an einem sehr frühen Punkt zum Verzweifeln. Vielleicht komme ich doch irgendwann auf eine Kombination aus Qt und Nebula Device zurück…

]]> Comment on Qt Framework introduction by Thomas Keller http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/08/14/qt-framework-introduction/#comment-454 Thomas Keller Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:57:00 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=163#comment-454 <p>Nein, mit GTK kenne ich mich absolut nicht aus. Ich beschäftige mich auch nur hobbymäßig mit Qt und sah hier eine Chance, meine .Net- und Java-verblendeten Kollegen von meiner Lieblingsentwicklungsbibliothek zu überzeugen... ;)</p> Nein, mit GTK kenne ich mich absolut nicht aus. Ich beschäftige mich auch nur hobbymäßig mit Qt und sah hier eine Chance, meine .Net- und Java-verblendeten Kollegen von meiner Lieblingsentwicklungsbibliothek zu überzeugen… ;)

]]> Comment on Qt Framework introduction by Plasma http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/08/14/qt-framework-introduction/#comment-453 Plasma Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:42:33 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=163#comment-453 <p>Sehr geil, sowas für den Einstieg hab ich ja schon länger gesucht. Du hast so einen Vortrag nicht zufällig auch schon mal für GTK verfasst? ;-)</p> Sehr geil, sowas für den Einstieg hab ich ja schon länger gesucht. Du hast so einen Vortrag nicht zufällig auch schon mal für GTK verfasst? ;-)

]]> Comment on La-La-Land vs Reality by Alexander Groß http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/27/lalalandvsreality/#comment-400 Alexander Groß Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:45:38 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=81#comment-400 <p>That link was destroyed by WP. Here's an alternative: http://xrl.in/aks</p> That link was destroyed by WP. Here’s an alternative: http://xrl.in/aks

]]> Comment on La-La-Land vs Reality by Alexander Groß http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/27/lalalandvsreality/#comment-399 Alexander Groß Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:43:39 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=81#comment-399 <p>A good friend of mine pointed me to this TED talk today. Lighter content than Jill Bolte Taylor's presentation, but worthwhile nonetheless.</p> <p>http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/keith<em>barry</em>does<em>brain</em>magic.html</p> A good friend of mine pointed me to this TED talk today. Lighter content than Jill Bolte Taylor’s presentation, but worthwhile nonetheless.

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/keithbarrydoesbrainmagic.html

]]> Comment on wattzOn! by dead fish » Blog Archive » La-La-Land vs Reality http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/03/27/wattzon/#comment-397 dead fish » Blog Archive » La-La-Land vs Reality Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:54:05 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/03/27/wattzon/#comment-397 <p>[...] how many mind-boggling individuals share their ideas and thinkings there. When I wrote about Saul Griffith and his website WattzOn! a while ago, this was one of these remarkable talks which influenced my thinkings and view of [...]</p> [...] how many mind-boggling individuals share their ideas and thinkings there. When I wrote about Saul Griffith and his website WattzOn! a while ago, this was one of these remarkable talks which influenced my thinkings and view of [...]

]]> Comment on reCaptcha by Chad http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/24/recaptcha/#comment-391 Chad Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:59:57 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=80#comment-391 <p>Ah, but see, that's what makes this bizarre - they don't actually have my sites linked on theirs. They're just doing something to make it look like they're sending me hits so that they get to the top of my referrer logs.</p> <p>I'm guessing they're doing this to numerous sites with the thought being "Well, maybe they display top referrers on their site", but they don't actually look at the sites they're fucking with. That's the only thing I can think of, and it's pretty stupid if so, but I'm clueless beyond that one.</p> Ah, but see, that’s what makes this bizarre - they don’t actually have my sites linked on theirs. They’re just doing something to make it look like they’re sending me hits so that they get to the top of my referrer logs.

I’m guessing they’re doing this to numerous sites with the thought being “Well, maybe they display top referrers on their site”, but they don’t actually look at the sites they’re fucking with. That’s the only thing I can think of, and it’s pretty stupid if so, but I’m clueless beyond that one.

]]> Comment on reCaptcha by tommyd http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/24/recaptcha/#comment-390 tommyd Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:16:34 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=80#comment-390 <p>No, luckily not yet. I guess this site is not so important for them ;)</p> <p>Incoming (bad) links should drive the pagerank of the linked website (yours) lower if my understanding is right, but yeah, I don't know what the linkers should gain from that (given the fact that a site does not gain anything in the pagerank just by linking to quality sites).</p> No, luckily not yet. I guess this site is not so important for them ;)

Incoming (bad) links should drive the pagerank of the linked website (yours) lower if my understanding is right, but yeah, I don’t know what the linkers should gain from that (given the fact that a site does not gain anything in the pagerank just by linking to quality sites).

]]> Comment on reCaptcha by Chad http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/24/recaptcha/#comment-389 Chad Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:53:42 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=80#comment-389 <p>Have you started getting referral spam yet? I'm getting flooded with it, and I really don't see what they expect to get out of this. Here's some of my top referrers for the month:</p> <ul> <li>http://refinance.bestloaninc</li> <li>http://mortgagerate.mortgagecentredirect</li> <li>http://auto-insurance.theinsurancedirect</li> <li>http://college-loan.loanwebworld</li> <li>http://securedloan.theloansline</li> <li>http://loanrate.loanatweb</li> <li>http://carloans.totalloansdirect</li> <li>http://home-loan-mortgage.greatmortgageidea</li> <li>http://quick-loan.loanonlinedirect</li> </ul> <p>("www" and ".com" removed so as not to give them any search engine weight).</p> Have you started getting referral spam yet? I’m getting flooded with it, and I really don’t see what they expect to get out of this. Here’s some of my top referrers for the month:

(”www” and “.com” removed so as not to give them any search engine weight).

]]> Comment on Time to move on? by Chad http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/2008/07/23/time-to-move-on/#comment-373 Chad Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:56:29 +0000 http://www.thomaskeller.biz/blog/?p=79#comment-373 <p>eep... good luck with however you decide to handle this "software" problem.</p> eep… good luck with however you decide to handle this “software” problem.

]]>